TL;DR: “Breakfast is the most important meal of the day” is a claim with roots more in cereal marketing than in rigorous neuroscience. The actual evidence is layered: children and adolescents consistently perform better cognitively after eating breakfast, and elderly populations show similar benefits. For healthy adults, the picture is far more mixed — habitual breakfast skippers who are metabolically healthy show little measurable cognitive penalty. What matters more than whether you eat breakfast is what that breakfast contains. A high-sugar, high-GI morning meal can impair cognition more than skipping breakfast entirely. If you do eat breakfast, prioritise protein, healthy fats, and low-glycemic carbohydrates. If you skip it as part of a deliberate fasting practice and feel sharp, the evidence does not suggest you are damaging your brain.

Introduction

Few nutritional claims are as deeply embedded in popular culture as the idea that breakfast is the most important meal of the day. Parents repeat it to reluctant children. Cereal boxes imply it. Public health campaigns have built entire programmes around it. And yet, in the past two decades, a counter-movement has gained enormous momentum: the intermittent fasting community, which argues that skipping breakfast is not only harmless but actively beneficial — that extending the overnight fast unlocks metabolic advantages, from improved insulin sensitivity to enhanced autophagy and sharper mental clarity.

Both sides tend toward absolutes, and both are partly right. The truth, as usual in nutrition science, depends on who you are, what you would eat for breakfast, and what metabolic state you are in when you wake up. The research on breakfast and cognition stretches back decades and encompasses thousands of studies — but it is more heterogeneous, more context-dependent, and less conclusive than either camp would have you believe.

This article examines what the evidence actually shows, who benefits most from eating breakfast, who can safely skip it, and what constitutes a breakfast that genuinely supports cognitive performance rather than undermining it.

The Origins of “The Most Important Meal”

Before evaluating the science, it is worth understanding where the cultural conviction came from. The phrase “breakfast is the most important meal of the day” was popularised in the early 20th century by James Caleb Jackson and John Harvey Kellogg — both of whom, not coincidentally, were in the business of selling breakfast cereals. The marketing campaign was remarkably effective, embedding itself so thoroughly in Western culture that questioning breakfast’s importance can still feel vaguely transgressive.

This does not mean the claim is wrong. But it does mean the cultural certainty around breakfast far outstrips the scientific certainty. Much of the early research supporting breakfast’s cognitive benefits was observational — comparing children who ate breakfast with those who did not — and suffered from significant confounding. Children who skip breakfast are more likely to come from lower-income households, to have less parental supervision, to sleep poorly, and to have less stable home environments. Disentangling the effects of breakfast from the effects of socioeconomic advantage proved difficult and, in many early studies, was not seriously attempted.

Evidence in Children and Adolescents: The Strongest Case

If there is one population where the evidence for breakfast and cognition is genuinely strong, it is school-aged children and adolescents. Multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses have consistently found that children who eat breakfast perform better on measures of attention, memory, and academic achievement than those who do not.

The Key Studies

Hoyland et al. (2009), in a systematic review published in Nutrition Research Reviews, analysed 45 studies examining the acute effects of breakfast on cognitive function in children and adolescents. They concluded that breakfast consumption was associated with benefits in memory, attention, and school performance, with the most consistent effects observed in tasks requiring sustained attention and episodic memory. The effects were particularly pronounced in nutritionally vulnerable children — those who were undernourished or from food-insecure households.

Adolphus et al. (2013) extended this analysis with a broader systematic review covering both acute experimental studies and chronic observational designs. They found that breakfast had the most reliable positive effects on attention, executive function, and memory in children aged 6 to 16, though the magnitude of the effect varied depending on the type of breakfast consumed and the cognitive domain tested. Habitual breakfast consumption was associated with better academic grades across multiple studies, though establishing causality remained challenging due to confounding variables.

A large-scale study by Defeyter and Russo (2013) used a within-subjects design to control for individual differences and found that 9- to 11-year-old children showed significantly better performance on tasks measuring declarative memory, working memory, and attention on mornings when they had eaten breakfast compared to mornings when they had fasted.

Why Children Are Different

The developing brain is more vulnerable to glycemic disruption than the adult brain. Children have higher brain metabolic rates relative to body size — the brain of a 5-year-old consumes roughly 50% of the body’s resting metabolic energy, compared to approximately 20% in adults (Kuzawa et al., 2014). This means the developing brain is more sensitive to fuel deprivation, even short-term.

Children also have smaller hepatic glycogen reserves than adults, meaning their overnight fast depletes glucose stores more completely. By morning, a child’s brain may be operating closer to the margin of adequate glucose supply than an adult’s. Providing breakfast replenishes these stores and stabilises the glucose supply on which the developing brain depends.

Furthermore, children have limited capacity for metabolic adaptation. Adults who habitually skip breakfast develop compensatory mechanisms — enhanced hepatic gluconeogenesis, more efficient fatty acid oxidation — that maintain glucose homeostasis during extended fasting. Children’s metabolic flexibility is less developed, making them more dependent on exogenous glucose from food.

Evidence in Adults: Mixed and Context-Dependent

The adult literature on breakfast and cognition is considerably less clear-cut than the paediatric evidence. This is where the debate becomes genuinely complicated.

Studies Supporting Breakfast

Some adult studies have found cognitive benefits from breakfast consumption. Benton and Parker (1998) demonstrated that healthy adults who ate breakfast performed better on spatial memory tasks compared to those who fasted. Smith et al. (1994) reported that breakfast consumption improved free recall and recognition memory in young adults.

A systematic review by Galioto and Spitznagel (2016) examined the effects of breakfast on executive function in adults and found modest positive effects, particularly on tasks requiring sustained attention and working memory. However, the authors noted substantial heterogeneity across studies and cautioned that effect sizes were generally small.

Studies Showing No Benefit — or Harm

Other adult studies have found no cognitive penalty from skipping breakfast, particularly in habitual breakfast skippers. Neely et al. (2012) compared cognitive performance in adults who habitually ate or skipped breakfast, testing them under both conditions. They found that habitual breakfast skippers performed equally well whether they ate or fasted, while habitual breakfast eaters showed some impairment when forced to skip — suggesting that the cognitive effects of breakfast are mediated by habit and expectation rather than by an absolute physiological requirement.

Zilberter and Zilberter (2013) argued in a critical review that much of the breakfast-cognition research in adults was methodologically flawed, with inadequate controls, failure to account for habitual meal patterns, and over-reliance on self-reported dietary data. They concluded that the evidence did not support a universal recommendation that adults eat breakfast for cognitive benefit.

A randomised controlled trial by Dye et al. (2000) found that while breakfast improved mood and subjective feelings of alertness, it had no measurable effect on objective cognitive performance in healthy young adults. This dissociation between subjective and objective effects is a recurring theme in the literature — people often feel sharper after breakfast without demonstrating measurably better cognitive performance.

The Habituation Factor

Perhaps the most important moderator of breakfast’s cognitive effects in adults is habituation. The brain adapts to predictable eating patterns. Individuals who routinely eat breakfast may experience transient cognitive disruption when that meal is removed — not because breakfast is inherently necessary, but because their metabolic system is calibrated to expect it. Conversely, habitual breakfast skippers have adjusted their glucose regulation, hormonal rhythms, and subjective energy patterns to function well without morning food.

Witbracht et al. (2015) investigated this by randomising habitual breakfast eaters and breakfast skippers to either eat or skip breakfast for six weeks. They found that when habitual eaters began skipping, they experienced initial increases in afternoon cortisol and subjective hunger — but these effects attenuated over the study period as their physiology adapted. The implication is that breakfast’s cognitive effects are partly a consequence of routine disruption rather than of fundamental nutritional necessity.

Glycemic Quality: What You Eat Matters More Than Whether You Eat

One of the most consistent findings across the breakfast-cognition literature is that the glycemic quality of breakfast matters more than whether breakfast is consumed at all. A high-sugar, high-GI breakfast can produce a sharper cognitive decline than fasting.

The Glycemic Index Evidence

Benton et al. (2007) compared the cognitive effects of high-GI and low-GI breakfasts in adults and found that low-GI breakfasts (such as whole-grain porridge with nuts) produced better sustained attention and memory performance throughout the morning. High-GI breakfasts (such as cornflakes with sugar) improved cognitive function briefly in the first 30 minutes but led to worse performance two hours later, as the reactive glucose crash impaired attention and working memory.

Ingwersen et al. (2007) demonstrated the same pattern in children: a low-GI cereal breakfast improved accuracy on attention tasks and maintained cognitive performance throughout the morning, while a high-GI cereal produced initial improvement followed by progressive deterioration.

Micha et al. (2011), in a randomised crossover study, found that adolescents who consumed a low-GI breakfast had better memory, attention, and on-task behaviour during late-morning classes compared to those who ate a high-GI breakfast or skipped breakfast entirely. Critically, the high-GI breakfast group performed worse in late-morning cognitive tests than the fasting group — suggesting that a poor breakfast is cognitively worse than no breakfast.

The Glucose Crash Mechanism

The reason a high-GI breakfast impairs cognition is well understood. Rapidly absorbed carbohydrates — white bread, sugary cereals, fruit juice, pastries — produce a sharp spike in blood glucose followed by an exaggerated insulin response that overshoots, driving glucose below baseline within 90 to 120 minutes. This reactive hypoglycaemia produces a predictable cluster of cognitive symptoms: difficulty concentrating, mental fog, irritability, and degraded working memory. For a deeper look at this mechanism, see our article on blood sugar and brain function.

The brain has virtually no glucose storage capacity and depends on continuous supply from the blood. When that supply drops rapidly, cognitive performance degrades within minutes (Mergenthaler et al., 2013). A breakfast that produces this pattern is actively harmful to morning cognitive performance — worse than the stable, gradually declining glucose trajectory of a controlled overnight fast.

Overnight Fasting and Morning Glucose Physiology

Understanding what happens to blood glucose during sleep and upon waking helps explain why breakfast’s effects are so variable across individuals.

The Dawn Phenomenon

Between approximately 4 AM and 8 AM, the liver increases glucose output in response to rising cortisol and growth hormone — a process known as the dawn phenomenon. This ensures that blood glucose is adequate for waking activity even without food intake. In healthy, insulin-sensitive individuals, this process is well-regulated: glucose rises modestly, insulin responds appropriately, and the brain has adequate fuel supply upon waking.

In individuals with insulin resistance, however, the dawn phenomenon can produce exaggerated morning glucose elevations because their insulin response is insufficient to contain the hepatic glucose output. For these individuals, eating a protein-rich breakfast may actually help stabilise glucose by stimulating insulin secretion and suppressing further hepatic output.

Hepatic Glycogen and Individual Variation

The degree to which overnight fasting depletes liver glycogen varies significantly based on the timing, composition, and size of the previous evening’s meal, as well as the individual’s metabolic rate and muscle mass. A person who ate a large, carbohydrate-rich dinner at 9 PM will wake with substantially more glycogen than someone who ate a light, early dinner. This variation means the metabolic state of any given person upon waking is highly individual — and therefore, so is their need for breakfast.

Rothschild et al. (2014), in a review of meal frequency and cognitive function, noted that the metabolic context of the morning fast — not merely its duration — determines whether breakfast consumption improves cognitive outcomes. Two people who both “skipped breakfast” may be in very different metabolic states depending on what they ate the night before, how well they slept, their body composition, and their level of insulin sensitivity.

Who Benefits Most From Breakfast

Children and Adolescents

As reviewed above, this is the population with the strongest evidence. Growing brains have higher metabolic demands, smaller glycogen reserves, and less metabolic flexibility. Breakfast programmes in schools consistently show improvements in academic performance and behaviour, particularly for children from food-insecure households (Meyers et al., 1989; Kleinman et al., 2002). The evidence is strong enough to support public health recommendations.

Older Adults

The ageing brain presents a parallel vulnerability to the developing brain, though for different reasons. Cerebral glucose metabolism declines with age — PET imaging studies show progressive reductions in glucose uptake in the frontal and temporal cortices beginning in the sixth decade (Mosconi et al., 2008). Older adults are also more likely to have insulin resistance, which further compromises brain glucose utilisation.

Kaplan et al. (2001), in a series of studies at the University of Toronto, demonstrated that glucose administration in the morning significantly improved memory performance in older adults, with the greatest benefits observed in those with poorer baseline glucose regulation. Fischer et al. (2001) found that breakfast consumption was associated with better cognitive function in elderly participants, particularly on tasks involving episodic memory and verbal fluency.

For older adults, particularly those at risk of cognitive decline, a nutritious breakfast appears to provide a meaningful cognitive advantage.

Physically Demanding Workers

Individuals whose morning work involves sustained physical effort — construction, manual labour, agricultural work — have higher glucose demands and may deplete glycogen stores more rapidly. For these populations, breakfast provides both cognitive and physical performance benefits, and the evidence for skipping is less favourable.

People With Poor Glucose Regulation

Individuals with prediabetes, metabolic syndrome, or type 2 diabetes often experience exaggerated overnight glucose fluctuations and impaired dawn-phenomenon regulation. For these individuals, a protein-rich, low-GI breakfast can help stabilise morning glucose and improve cognitive performance during the first half of the day (Maki et al., 2007).

Who May Skip Breakfast Safely

Adapted Intermittent Fasting Practitioners

Adults who have practised time-restricted eating for several weeks or more develop metabolic adaptations — enhanced fatty acid oxidation, improved gluconeogenesis efficiency, and mild ketone production — that maintain stable glucose supply to the brain without morning food intake. These adaptations are well-documented (Anton et al., 2018) and explain why habitual breakfast skippers often report feeling mentally clear during their morning fast.

The key distinction is adaptation. An individual who abruptly stops eating breakfast after decades of habitual consumption may experience several days to weeks of impaired morning cognition as their metabolic system adjusts. This transitional cognitive dip does not indicate permanent harm — it reflects the time required for metabolic recalibration.

Metabolically Healthy Adults Without Morning Cognitive Demands

Healthy adults who do not face cognitively demanding work first thing in the morning — those whose early hours involve routine physical tasks, commuting, or light administrative work — may have little practical need for breakfast’s cognitive effects. If their critical cognitive work occurs later in the day, by which time they have eaten, the absence of a morning meal is unlikely to affect meaningful performance outcomes.

Individuals Whose Breakfast Options Are Poor

This is an underappreciated point. A person whose realistic breakfast options consist of sugary cereal, pastries, white toast with jam, or a fast-food breakfast sandwich may be better off skipping the meal entirely. As the glycemic index evidence demonstrates, a high-GI breakfast can impair cognitive performance more than fasting does. If the choice is between a doughnut and nothing, nothing is the better cognitive strategy.

What Makes an Optimal Cognitive Breakfast

If you decide to eat breakfast — and for many people, it is genuinely beneficial — the composition matters enormously. An optimal cognitive breakfast shares several characteristics, all supported by evidence.

Protein

Protein at breakfast serves multiple cognitive functions. It stimulates the release of neurotransmitter precursors — tyrosine for dopamine and norepinephrine, tryptophan for serotonin. It slows gastric emptying, producing a more gradual glucose rise. And it promotes satiety, reducing the likelihood of mid-morning energy crashes.

Fischer et al. (2004) found that a high-protein breakfast improved performance on sustained attention tasks compared to a high-carbohydrate breakfast in young adults. Leidy et al. (2013) demonstrated that a protein-rich breakfast (35 grams of protein) reduced subsequent cravings and improved glycemic control throughout the day compared to a normal-protein or no-breakfast condition.

Practical sources: eggs, Greek yogurt, cottage cheese, smoked salmon, nuts and seeds, tofu.

Low-Glycemic Carbohydrates

Carbohydrates that produce a slow, sustained glucose rise provide the brain with stable fuel without the spike-crash cycle. Steel-cut or rolled oats, whole-grain sourdough bread, sweet potatoes, and berries are all excellent choices. These foods also tend to be rich in fibre, which further moderates glucose absorption.

Healthy Fats

Fats slow glucose absorption and provide essential fatty acids for neuronal membrane integrity. Avocado, olive oil, nuts, seeds, and fatty fish are ideal breakfast fat sources. Omega-3 fatty acids in particular have well-documented roles in brain function and synaptic plasticity (Bazinet & Laye, 2014).

Fibre

Soluble fibre from oats, flaxseed, chia seeds, and berries forms a gel in the small intestine that physically slows glucose absorption. A breakfast containing 8 to 10 grams of fibre will produce a meaningfully flatter glucose curve than the same meal without fibre.

Example Optimal Breakfasts

  • Steel-cut oats with walnuts, blueberries, and a scoop of Greek yogurt
  • Two eggs scrambled with spinach and avocado on whole-grain sourdough
  • Smoked salmon with cream cheese on rye bread, with a side of mixed berries
  • Overnight chia pudding with almond butter, hemp seeds, and sliced banana
  • Vegetable omelette with feta cheese, served with a small portion of roasted sweet potato

Worst Breakfast Choices for Cognition

Some popular breakfast foods are actively counterproductive for cognitive performance. These share common features: high glycemic index, high sugar content, minimal protein, and little fibre.

Sugary Cereals

Most commercial breakfast cereals are engineered for taste, not for brain function. Many contain 10 to 15 grams of sugar per serving with minimal protein and fibre. When consumed with low-fat milk, they produce a rapid glucose spike followed by a crash. Ingwersen et al. (2007) demonstrated that high-GI cereals produced progressive cognitive deterioration throughout the morning in children — an effect that likely extends to adults.

Pastries and Baked Goods

Croissants, muffins, Danish pastries, and doughnuts combine refined flour with sugar and fat in a way that maximises glycemic impact. They provide virtually no protein, minimal fibre, and no micronutrients relevant to brain function.

Fruit Juice

A glass of orange juice contains roughly the same sugar as a can of soft drink, without the fibre matrix that moderates glucose absorption when eating whole fruit. Juice produces a rapid glucose spike and contributes to the reactive hypoglycaemia that undermines mid-morning cognition. Whole fruit is a far superior choice.

White Toast With Jam or Honey

White bread has a glycemic index comparable to pure glucose. Adding jam or honey compounds the problem. This combination provides rapid glucose with no protein, fat, or fibre to moderate absorption — a recipe for a glucose crash 90 minutes later, precisely when many people need peak cognitive performance.

“Healthy” Flavoured Yogurts

Many commercial yogurts marketed as healthy breakfast options contain 15 to 25 grams of added sugar per serving. The protein content is often insufficient to offset the glycemic impact. Plain, full-fat Greek yogurt with fresh fruit is nutritionally superior in every relevant dimension.

Practical Takeaway

  1. For children and adolescents, breakfast genuinely matters. The evidence is strong and consistent. Ensure children eat a nutritious breakfast before school, prioritising protein and low-GI carbohydrates over sugary cereals and pastries.

  2. For adults, the evidence is context-dependent. Healthy adults who habitually skip breakfast and feel cognitively sharp are unlikely to benefit from forcing a morning meal. Those who eat breakfast should focus on glycemic quality.

  3. Glycemic quality trumps breakfast itself. A high-sugar, high-GI breakfast impairs cognition more than fasting does. If your only options are poor ones, skipping may be the better cognitive strategy.

  4. Older adults should prioritise morning nutrition. Declining cerebral glucose metabolism makes the ageing brain more dependent on stable exogenous glucose supply. A protein-rich, low-GI breakfast supports morning cognitive performance in this population.

  5. If you eat breakfast, build it around protein, healthy fats, fibre, and low-GI carbohydrates. Eggs, oats, nuts, berries, yogurt, and avocado are superior to cereals, pastries, and juice.

  6. If you are transitioning to intermittent fasting, expect a brief adaptation period. Several days to two weeks of slightly diminished morning focus is normal as your metabolic system recalibrates. This is temporary and does not indicate long-term harm.

  7. Individual variation is real and should be respected. Monitor your own cognitive performance honestly. If you feel foggy without breakfast, eat breakfast. If you feel sharp while fasting, continue. Your subjective experience, when assessed honestly, is a valid data point.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is “breakfast is the most important meal of the day” scientifically accurate?

Not as a universal claim. The phrase originated as marketing for cereal companies and has persisted more through cultural repetition than through scientific consensus. Breakfast is important for children, elderly adults, and individuals with poor glucose regulation. For healthy adults, particularly those adapted to skipping breakfast, it is not demonstrably more important than lunch or dinner. The quality of your overall dietary pattern matters more than any single meal.

Will skipping breakfast cause me to gain weight and worsen my metabolic health?

The observational association between skipping breakfast and weight gain is well-known but likely confounded. People who skip breakfast also tend to have other unhealthy behaviours — irregular sleep, higher stress, poorer overall diet quality. Randomised controlled trials, including a large trial by Dhurandhar et al. (2014) published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, found no significant difference in weight loss between groups assigned to eat or skip breakfast. Deliberate, structured breakfast skipping as part of a time-restricted eating protocol does not appear to cause metabolic harm in healthy individuals.

How long after waking should I eat to optimise cognitive performance?

There is no single optimal window. For children and those who benefit from breakfast, eating within 60 to 90 minutes of waking aligns with the period when overnight glycogen depletion is most likely to affect cognitive performance. For adults practising intermittent fasting, the evidence suggests that cognitive adaptation to delayed eating occurs within one to two weeks and that morning cognitive performance stabilises once the adaptation is complete.

Can coffee replace breakfast for cognitive function?

Coffee and breakfast affect cognition through different mechanisms. Caffeine blocks adenosine receptors, reducing the sensation of fatigue and improving alertness, attention, and reaction time. It does not provide glucose or macronutrients. Black coffee consumed during a morning fast can improve subjective alertness and some measures of cognitive performance (McLellan et al., 2016) without breaking the metabolic fasting state. However, caffeine does not address the glucose-dependent cognitive demands that breakfast serves in children or metabolically vulnerable adults. For healthy adults, coffee is a reasonable complement to — or temporary substitute for — breakfast, but it is not nutritionally equivalent.

Does eating breakfast improve mood and mental health?

Several studies have found associations between habitual breakfast consumption and better mood, lower stress levels, and reduced symptoms of depression and anxiety — particularly in adolescents and young adults (O’Sullivan et al., 2009). However, these associations are observational and may reflect broader lifestyle factors. The acute mood-boosting effect of breakfast is more consistently documented than acute cognitive effects in adults and may be partly mediated by the social and routine aspects of a morning meal, not solely by its nutritional content.

Sources

  • Adolphus, K., Lawton, C. L., & Dye, L. (2013). The effects of breakfast on behavior and academic performance in children and adolescents. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 425.
  • Anton, S. D., Moehl, K., Donahoo, W. T., Marosi, K., Lee, S. A., Mainous, A. G., … & Mattson, M. P. (2018). Flipping the metabolic switch: understanding and applying the health benefits of fasting. Obesity, 26(2), 254-268.
  • Bazinet, R. P., & Laye, S. (2014). Polyunsaturated fatty acids and their metabolites in brain function and disease. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(12), 771-785.
  • Benton, D., & Parker, P. Y. (1998). Breakfast, blood glucose, and cognition. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 67(4), 772S-778S.
  • Benton, D., Maconie, A., & Williams, C. (2007). The influence of the glycaemic load of breakfast on the behaviour of children in school. Physiology & Behavior, 92(4), 717-724.
  • Defeyter, M. A., & Russo, R. (2013). The effect of breakfast cereal consumption on adolescents’ cognitive performance and mood. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 789.
  • Dhurandhar, E. J., Dawson, J., Alcorn, A., Larsen, L. H., Thomas, E. A., Cardel, M., … & Allison, D. B. (2014). The effectiveness of breakfast recommendations on weight loss: a randomized controlled trial. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 100(2), 507-513.
  • Dye, L., Lluch, A., & Blundell, J. E. (2000). Macronutrients and mental performance. Nutrition, 16(10), 1021-1034.
  • Fischer, K., Colombani, P. C., Langhans, W., & Wenk, C. (2001). Cognitive performance and its relationship with postprandial metabolic changes after ingestion of different macronutrients in the morning. British Journal of Nutrition, 85(3), 393-405.
  • Fischer, K., Colombani, P. C., Langhans, W., & Wenk, C. (2004). Carbohydrate to protein ratio in food and cognitive performance in the morning. Physiology & Behavior, 75(3), 411-423.
  • Galioto, R., & Spitznagel, M. B. (2016). The effects of breakfast and breakfast composition on cognition in adults. Advances in Nutrition, 7(3), 576S-589S.
  • Hoyland, A., Dye, L., & Lawton, C. L. (2009). A systematic review of the effect of breakfast on the cognitive performance of children and adolescents. Nutrition Research Reviews, 22(2), 220-243.
  • Ingwersen, J., Defeyter, M. A., Kennedy, D. O., Wesnes, K. A., & Scholey, A. B. (2007). A low glycaemic index breakfast cereal preferentially prevents children’s cognitive performance from declining throughout the morning. Appetite, 49(1), 240-244.
  • Kaplan, R. J., Greenwood, C. E., Winocur, G., & Wolever, T. M. (2001). Dietary protein, carbohydrate, and fat enhance memory performance in the healthy elderly. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 74(5), 687-693.
  • Kleinman, R. E., Hall, S., Green, H., Korzec-Ramirez, D., Patton, K., Pagano, M. E., & Murphy, J. M. (2002). Diet, breakfast, and academic performance in children. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, 46(suppl 1), 24-30.
  • Kuzawa, C. W., Chugani, H. T., Grossman, L. I., Lipovich, L., Muzik, O., Hof, P. R., … & Lange, N. (2014). Metabolic costs and evolutionary implications of human brain development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(36), 13010-13015.
  • Leidy, H. J., Ortinau, L. C., Douglas, S. M., & Hoertel, H. A. (2013). Beneficial effects of a higher-protein breakfast on the appetitive, hormonal, and neural signals controlling energy intake regulation in overweight/obese, “breakfast-skipping,” late-adolescent girls. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 97(4), 677-688.
  • Maki, K. C., Rains, T. M., Kaden, V. N., Raneri, K. R., & Davidson, M. H. (2007). Effects of a reduced-glycemic-load diet on body weight, body composition, and cardiovascular disease risk markers in overweight and obese adults. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 85(3), 724-734.
  • McLellan, T. M., Caldwell, J. A., & Lieberman, H. R. (2016). A review of caffeine’s effects on cognitive, physical and occupational performance. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 71, 294-312.
  • Mergenthaler, P., Lindauer, U., Dienel, G. A., & Meisel, A. (2013). Sugar for the brain: the role of glucose in physiological and pathological brain function. Trends in Neurosciences, 36(10), 587-597.
  • Meyers, A. F., Sampson, A. E., Weitzman, M., Rogers, B. L., & Kayne, H. (1989). School breakfast program and school performance. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 143(10), 1234-1239.
  • Micha, R., Rogers, P. J., & Nelson, M. (2011). Glycaemic index and glycaemic load of breakfast predict cognitive function and mood in school children: a randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Nutrition, 106(10), 1552-1561.
  • Mosconi, L., Pupi, A., & De Leon, M. J. (2008). Brain glucose hypometabolism and oxidative stress in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1147, 180-195.
  • Neely, G., Landstrom, U., & Bystrom, A. (2012). Does the effect of breakfast on cognitive function depend on habitual consumption? Appetite, 58(3), 1142-1143.
  • O’Sullivan, T. A., Robinson, M., Kendall, G. E., de Klerk, N. H., Forbes, D. A., Silburn, S. R., … & Oddy, W. H. (2009). A good-quality breakfast is associated with better mental health in adolescence. Public Health Nutrition, 12(2), 249-258.
  • Rothschild, J., Hoddy, K. K., Jambazian, P., & Varady, K. A. (2014). Time-restricted feeding and risk of metabolic disease: a review of human and animal studies. Nutrition Reviews, 72(5), 308-318.
  • Smith, A. P., Kendrick, A. M., & Maben, A. L. (1994). Effects of breakfast and caffeine on cognitive performance, mood and cardiovascular functioning. Appetite, 22(1), 39-55.
  • Witbracht, M., Keim, N. L., Forester, S., Widaman, A., & Laugero, K. (2015). Female breakfast skippers display a disrupted cortisol rhythm and elevated blood pressure. Physiology & Behavior, 140, 215-221.
  • Zilberter, T., & Zilberter, E. Y. (2013). Breakfast: to skip or not to skip? Frontiers in Public Health, 1, 59.