TL;DR: Most fish oil supplements contain far less usable EPA+DHA than the front label implies. To get real cognitive and anti-inflammatory benefits, look for a product in triglyceride (rTG) or phospholipid form, with at least 500 mg combined EPA+DHA per serving, certified by a third-party testing body like IFOS or USP, and with documented low oxidation values. Calculate cost per gram of EPA+DHA — not cost per capsule — to compare products honestly. For brain health specifically, prioritize DHA-dominant formulations; for mood support, choose EPA-dominant ones. Vegans should use algal oil, which provides preformed DHA without the fish. Store all omega-3 supplements in a cool, dark place and discard anything that smells strongly fishy — that is the smell of rancidity, not potency.
Introduction
Walk into any pharmacy or health food store and you will find an entire shelf of fish oil supplements. Soft gels, liquids, flavored gummies, krill oil, cod liver oil, “triple strength” formulations — the options are overwhelming, and the marketing is designed to obscure more than it clarifies.
Here is the core problem: the clinical trials demonstrating cognitive benefits, mood improvements, and cardiovascular protection from omega-3 fatty acids used specific doses of EPA and DHA in specific forms under controlled quality conditions. The average consumer product on a drugstore shelf may share almost nothing in common with what was used in those studies. A “1,000 mg fish oil” capsule that delivers only 300 mg of combined EPA+DHA — much of it in poorly absorbed ethyl ester form, potentially oxidized, with no independent verification of purity — is a fundamentally different product from the concentrated, triglyceride-form, third-party-tested oil used in rigorous clinical research.
This gap between what the science supports and what most people actually buy is the reason this guide exists. Choosing a fish oil supplement is not complicated once you know the handful of variables that genuinely matter. Everything else is marketing noise.
Why Fish Oil Quality Matters
Oxidation and Rancidity
Omega-3 fatty acids are polyunsaturated fats, meaning their chemical structure contains multiple double bonds. These double bonds make omega-3s biologically valuable — they are what give neuronal membranes their fluidity and flexibility — but they also make omega-3s highly susceptible to oxidation. When omega-3 fats oxidize, they degrade into compounds such as peroxides, aldehydes, and other reactive species that are not merely inactive but potentially harmful.
Albert and colleagues (2015), in a comprehensive analysis published in BioMed Research International, reviewed the global state of fish oil quality and found that a significant proportion of commercial products exceeded recommended oxidation limits. A study by Jackowski and colleagues (2015) in the Journal of Nutritional Science tested retail fish oil supplements in Canada and reported that nearly 50 percent exceeded at least one recommended oxidation threshold. Similar findings have been documented in New Zealand (Bannenberg et al., 2017), South Africa, and other markets.
Why does this matter for the consumer? Oxidized fish oil has been shown in animal studies to increase markers of inflammation and oxidative stress — the opposite of what omega-3 supplementation is supposed to achieve. A 2016 study by Garcia-Hernandez and colleagues in The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry found that oxidized fish oil increased inflammatory cytokines in mice, while fresh fish oil reduced them. Whether these effects translate proportionally to humans at typical supplement doses is still debated, but the principle is clear: rancid oil is not a neutral substitute for fresh oil.
The practical markers of oxidation are the peroxide value (PV) and the anisidine value (AV), which together yield the TOTOX value (total oxidation, calculated as 2PV + AV). The Global Organization for EPA and DHA Omega-3s (GOED) recommends a TOTOX value below 26 for finished products. Premium brands publish these values or make them available upon request. If a manufacturer cannot or will not share oxidation data, that is itself informative.
Contaminants
Fish accumulate environmental contaminants — mercury, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dioxins, and other persistent organic pollutants — through bioaccumulation in the marine food chain. Larger, longer-lived predatory fish (shark, swordfish, king mackerel) carry the highest burdens. While the fish used for most fish oil supplements (anchovies, sardines, mackerel) are small and short-lived, the raw oil still requires purification.
Molecular distillation, the standard purification process used by reputable manufacturers, effectively removes heavy metals and most organic contaminants to levels well below safety thresholds. However, the key word is “reputable.” Not all products undergo the same degree of purification, and not all are independently verified. Third-party testing (discussed below) is the only reliable way to confirm that a product meets safety standards for contaminants.
Molecular Forms: What You Are Actually Swallowing
The form in which EPA and DHA are delivered matters for absorption. There are three primary forms on the market, and they are not equivalent.
Triglyceride (TG) and Re-esterified Triglyceride (rTG)
In whole fish, omega-3 fatty acids exist naturally in triglyceride form — three fatty acid chains attached to a glycerol backbone. This is the form your digestive system is optimized to handle. Pancreatic lipase efficiently cleaves the fatty acids from the glycerol, and they are absorbed through the intestinal wall as monoglycerides and free fatty acids.
Re-esterified triglyceride (rTG) is the concentrated version: fish oil is first converted to ethyl esters for purification and concentration, then enzymatically re-attached to glycerol to restore the triglyceride structure. The result is a product that combines the higher EPA+DHA concentration of processing with the superior bioavailability of the natural triglyceride form.
Dyerberg and colleagues (2010), in a study published in Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids, demonstrated that omega-3s in re-esterified triglyceride form had significantly higher bioavailability than ethyl esters — approximately 24 percent greater absorption over a 72-hour period when taken with a standard meal.
Ethyl Ester (EE)
During the purification and concentration process, fatty acids are detached from glycerol and bonded to ethanol, creating ethyl esters. Many manufacturers stop here because it is cheaper — re-esterification to triglyceride form requires an additional enzymatic step. The result is a product that is chemically distinct from anything found in nature.
Ethyl esters are not inherently dangerous, and they do deliver EPA and DHA. However, their absorption is meaningfully lower, particularly when taken on an empty stomach. Lawson and Hughes (1988), in a study published in Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, found that EPA and DHA from ethyl esters were absorbed roughly three times less efficiently than from triglycerides when taken without a fat-containing meal. With a high-fat meal, the absorption gap narrows but does not disappear.
The practical consequence: if you are taking ethyl ester fish oil, you need to take it with a meal containing fat to get reasonable absorption. With triglyceride form, absorption is robust regardless of meal composition.
Phospholipid Form (Krill Oil)
Krill oil delivers EPA and DHA bound to phospholipids — the same class of molecule that forms the structural basis of cell membranes. Some research suggests phospholipid-bound omega-3s may be incorporated into cell membranes more efficiently. Ramprasath and colleagues (2013), in a study in Lipids in Health and Disease, found comparable or slightly superior bioavailability for krill oil versus fish oil triglycerides at equivalent EPA+DHA doses.
The catch is concentration. A standard krill oil capsule contains significantly less total EPA+DHA per serving than a concentrated fish oil capsule — often 100–150 mg combined, versus 500–1,000 mg for a concentrated rTG fish oil. You would need to take substantially more krill oil capsules to reach therapeutic doses, which erodes the theoretical bioavailability advantage and dramatically increases cost.
Krill oil also contains astaxanthin, a potent carotenoid antioxidant that helps protect the oil from oxidation. This is a genuine advantage for stability, but it does not change the fundamental concentration problem.
Concentration: The Number That Actually Matters
This is the single most misunderstood aspect of fish oil supplementation. The number on the front of the bottle — typically “1,000 mg” or “1,200 mg” — refers to the total weight of the fish oil in the capsule, which includes the EPA, DHA, other omega-3s, other fats, and the gelatin capsule itself. It tells you almost nothing useful.
What matters is the EPA+DHA content per serving, which is listed in the supplement facts panel on the back. In a standard, unconcentrated 1,000 mg fish oil soft gel, you will typically find approximately 180 mg EPA and 120 mg DHA — a combined total of only 300 mg of the fatty acids you are actually paying for. The remaining 700 mg is other fats with no demonstrated cognitive or cardiovascular benefit at those doses.
This means that to reach a clinically meaningful dose of 1,000 mg EPA+DHA — the amount supported by research for cognitive benefits in older adults — you would need to take more than three standard capsules per day.
Concentrated fish oil products, by contrast, pack 500–900 mg of EPA+DHA into a single soft gel, typically in rTG form. These products cost more per capsule but less per gram of EPA+DHA, which is the metric that matters.
The formula is simple: divide the product price by the total mg of EPA+DHA in the bottle. Compare products on cost per gram of EPA+DHA, not cost per capsule or cost per bottle. A 30-dollar bottle of concentrated fish oil delivering 60 g of total EPA+DHA (0.50 dollars per gram) is a better value than a 15-dollar bottle of standard fish oil delivering 18 g of total EPA+DHA (0.83 dollars per gram) — even though the second bottle appears cheaper.
Third-Party Testing: The Only Verification That Counts
Supplement manufacturers are not required by the FDA to prove the accuracy of their labels before selling a product. The FDA operates on a post-market enforcement model for supplements, meaning problems are identified only after complaints, adverse events, or independent investigations. This places the burden of verification on the consumer.
Third-party testing organizations fill this gap. The major certifications to look for are:
IFOS (International Fish Oil Standards). The most rigorous certification specific to fish oil. IFOS tests for EPA and DHA content accuracy, oxidation levels (PV, AV, TOTOX), heavy metals (mercury, lead, cadmium, arsenic), PCBs, dioxins, and furans. Products are rated on a five-star scale, with five stars indicating compliance with or exceeding all tested parameters. IFOS publishes detailed lot-by-lot test results on their website, making them the gold standard for transparency.
USP (United States Pharmacopeia). A well-established third-party verification program that tests for identity, potency, purity, and performance (dissolution). The USP Verified Mark on a supplement indicates that it contains what the label claims, in the declared amounts, and is free of harmful levels of contaminants. USP certification is rigorous but less common in the fish oil category than IFOS.
ConsumerLab. An independent testing service that purchases products off retail shelves and tests them against label claims. ConsumerLab publishes pass/fail reports for thousands of supplements. While not a certification that manufacturers apply for, ConsumerLab approvals provide a useful independent check.
NSF International. Tests for contaminant levels, label accuracy, and GMP (Good Manufacturing Practice) compliance. The NSF Certified for Sport program is particularly relevant for athletes subject to anti-doping regulations.
If a fish oil product carries none of these certifications, you are relying entirely on the manufacturer’s own claims — which may or may not be accurate. Given the documented prevalence of mislabeling and oxidation issues in the fish oil market, third-party verification is not a luxury but a baseline requirement for informed purchasing.
Dosing for Brain Health
The optimal EPA+DHA dose depends on your specific goal. The clinical literature supports different ratios and amounts for different endpoints.
DHA-Dominant for Brain Structure and Cognition
DHA constitutes approximately 97 percent of the omega-3 fatty acids in the brain and roughly 10–20 percent of total fatty acids in the cerebral cortex. It is a structural component of neuronal membranes, essential for membrane fluidity, synaptic signaling, and the production of neuroprotective mediators such as neuroprotectin D1.
The Memory Improvement with DHA Study (MIDAS), conducted by Yurko-Mauro and colleagues (2010) and published in Alzheimer’s & Dementia, used 900 mg/day of algal DHA in healthy older adults with age-related cognitive decline. After 24 weeks, the DHA group showed significant improvement in paired associate learning — a measure of episodic memory — equivalent to having the cognitive performance of someone approximately three years younger.
For structural brain health and age-related cognitive support, aim for 500–1,000 mg DHA per day (see also our broader guide to omega-3 and brain health). Look for supplements that list DHA content separately and prominently. Some products marketed as “brain health” formulations already emphasize DHA over EPA.
EPA-Dominant for Mood and Inflammation
EPA exerts its primary brain benefits through systemic anti-inflammatory pathways. It competes with pro-inflammatory omega-6 arachidonic acid for enzymatic processing, shifting the balance toward anti-inflammatory and pro-resolving mediators.
Multiple meta-analyses — including Sublette et al. (2011) in the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry and Liao et al. (2019) in Translational Psychiatry — have found that EPA-predominant formulations (providing at least 60 percent of fatty acids as EPA) at doses of 1–2 g EPA per day produce significant reductions in depressive symptoms when used alongside standard treatment. The International Society for Nutritional Psychiatry Research recommends EPA-predominant omega-3 formulations as an adjunctive treatment for major depressive disorder.
If mood support is your primary goal, select a product with an EPA-to-DHA ratio of at least 2:1 and aim for 1,000 mg or more of EPA daily.
General Maintenance
For people without specific cognitive or mood concerns who simply want to maintain adequate omega-3 status, 500 mg combined EPA+DHA per day is the minimum target endorsed by most expert bodies, including the American Heart Association and the European Food Safety Authority.
Algal Oil: The Vegan Alternative
Fish do not synthesize DHA — they accumulate it by consuming microalgae (or consuming organisms that eat microalgae). Algal oil cuts out the middleman and provides preformed DHA directly from cultivated marine algae.
Algal DHA supplements have been shown to raise blood DHA levels equivalently to fish-derived DHA. A study by Ryan and Nelson (2008), published in Lipids, demonstrated that algal DHA supplementation (1.12 g/day) effectively raised the Omega-3 Index in healthy adults over a four-week period, to levels comparable with those achieved by fish oil.
Modern algal oil supplements increasingly provide both DHA and EPA, though DHA tends to be the dominant fatty acid. For vegans, vegetarians, or anyone who prefers to avoid fish-derived products, algal oil is the evidence-based choice. The same quality criteria apply: look for third-party testing, check EPA+DHA content per serving, and calculate cost per gram.
The main drawback of algal oil is cost — it is typically more expensive per gram of EPA+DHA than fish oil. However, prices have been decreasing as production scales up, and for those who avoid animal products, it remains the only reliable source of preformed long-chain omega-3s.
What to Look for on the Label
A systematic label check takes less than a minute and separates functional products from expensive filler. Here is what to examine:
Supplement Facts panel. Ignore the front of the bottle entirely. Look at the Supplement Facts for EPA and DHA amounts per serving. Add them together. This is the number that matters.
Form. Look for “triglyceride form,” “rTG,” “re-esterified triglyceride,” or “natural triglyceride” somewhere on the label or the manufacturer’s website. If the label says “ethyl ester” or says nothing about form, assume ethyl ester.
Third-party certification marks. Look for IFOS, USP, NSF, or ConsumerLab logos or statements. If none are present, check the manufacturer’s website for third-party test results.
Other ingredients. A short ingredient list is preferable. The oil, the capsule material (gelatin or a vegetarian alternative), and possibly a natural antioxidant (tocopherols, rosemary extract) or flavoring (lemon oil) are all you need. Avoid products with long lists of unnecessary additives.
Serving size. Some products list impressive EPA+DHA numbers but define a serving as two or three capsules. Recalculate the per-capsule content to compare accurately.
Expiration date. Omega-3 oils degrade over time. Ensure the product has a reasonable shelf life remaining and check it when you receive the product.
Storage and Freshness
Proper storage is not optional for polyunsaturated fats. Once you have purchased a quality product, you can undermine it entirely through poor handling.
Keep fish oil in a cool, dark place. Heat, light, and air are the three drivers of lipid oxidation. A kitchen cabinet away from the stove is adequate; the refrigerator is better, especially for liquid fish oil. Freezing fish oil capsules is also acceptable and can reduce any fishy aftertaste, as the oil releases more slowly in the digestive tract.
Seal the container after each use. Minimizing air exposure slows oxidation. For bottled liquid fish oil, use the product within the timeframe recommended by the manufacturer after opening — typically eight to twelve weeks.
Perform the smell and taste test. Fresh, high-quality fish oil should have a mild, slightly oceanic or neutral smell. If it smells strongly fishy, pungent, or like paint, it has oxidized. Some brands mask rancidity with heavy flavoring — lemon, strawberry, vanilla — so a faint off-note beneath the flavoring is worth paying attention to. If in doubt, bite into a capsule. Fresh oil tastes mildly fishy at worst; rancid oil has a sharp, acrid bite that is unmistakable.
Check the purchase source. Fish oil that has been sitting in a warm warehouse or on a sun-exposed retail shelf for months may already be compromised before you open it. Buying from retailers with high turnover or directly from manufacturers with controlled shipping conditions reduces this risk.
Common Mistakes Buyers Make
Having reviewed the variables that matter, here are the errors that most consumers make when purchasing fish oil — and how to avoid them.
Mistake 1: Buying on price per bottle. The cheapest bottle is almost never the best value. Low-cost fish oil is typically low-concentration ethyl ester with no third-party testing. Three capsules of cheap fish oil may deliver less usable EPA+DHA than one capsule of a concentrated rTG product.
Mistake 2: Trusting the front label. “1,000 mg fish oil” and “1,000 mg omega-3” are completely different claims. Always read the Supplement Facts panel. The front of the bottle is advertising, not data.
Mistake 3: Ignoring molecular form. The difference between triglyceride and ethyl ester absorption is not trivial. If you are spending money on a supplement intended to change your tissue omega-3 levels, the form that is better absorbed is the form worth paying for.
Mistake 4: Assuming all fish oil is the same. The range of quality in the fish oil market is enormous — from premium, third-party-verified, rTG products with published TOTOX values to unverified, potentially rancid ethyl ester oils with inaccurate labels. These are not interchangeable products.
Mistake 5: Taking fish oil on an empty stomach (especially ethyl ester). Omega-3 absorption — particularly from ethyl esters — is dramatically reduced without concurrent fat intake. Always take fish oil with a meal containing dietary fat.
Mistake 6: Not checking for freshness. Many people continue taking fish oil capsules long after the product has degraded. Oxidized oil may do more harm than good. Perform the smell test periodically, especially if the product has been stored for several months.
Mistake 7: Choosing gummies for serious supplementation. Omega-3 gummies are convenient but almost always deliver trivially low doses of EPA+DHA — often 50–100 mg per gummy. You would need to eat an impractical number of gummies to reach a meaningful dose, and the added sugars and fillers defeat the purpose of a health supplement.
Mistake 8: Ignoring EPA-to-DHA ratio for specific goals. A general-purpose fish oil is fine for baseline omega-3 intake, but if you are targeting brain structure (DHA-dominant) or mood (EPA-dominant), the ratio matters. Choose accordingly.
Practical Takeaway
Choosing the right fish oil supplement comes down to a short list of non-negotiable criteria. Here is the decision framework:
Check the Supplement Facts panel for EPA+DHA per serving. This is the only number that matters for dosing. Aim for at least 500 mg combined EPA+DHA per serving, and select your ratio based on your goal — DHA-dominant for cognitive structure, EPA-dominant for mood.
Choose triglyceride (rTG) or phospholipid form over ethyl ester. The absorption advantage is well-documented and worth the modest cost premium.
Require third-party testing. IFOS five-star certification is the gold standard. USP, NSF, and ConsumerLab approvals are also acceptable. If a product has no independent verification, move on.
Calculate cost per gram of EPA+DHA. Divide the bottle price by the total grams of EPA+DHA in the bottle. This is the only honest way to compare value across products.
Store properly and check for freshness. Refrigerate after opening, minimize air exposure, and discard any product that smells or tastes rancid.
If you are vegan or vegetarian, use algal oil. It provides preformed DHA (and increasingly EPA) without fish, and it is the only plant-based option that bypasses the inefficient ALA conversion pathway.
Take fish oil with a fat-containing meal. This maximizes absorption regardless of form and is especially critical for ethyl ester products.
Be skeptical of marketing language. Terms like “pharmaceutical grade,” “triple strength,” and “molecularly distilled” are not regulated and do not guarantee quality. Third-party certifications and published test results are what matter.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is expensive fish oil always better than cheap fish oil?
Not always, but the correlation is strong. Concentrated rTG fish oil with third-party testing costs more to produce, and that cost is passed to the consumer. Cheap fish oil is cheap for a reason — it is typically low-concentration ethyl ester with no independent quality verification. The best approach is to compare cost per gram of EPA+DHA rather than cost per bottle. Some mid-priced products offer excellent value; some expensive products are overpriced for what they deliver. Let the numbers guide you.
Can I get enough omega-3s from diet alone?
Yes, if you eat fatty fish regularly. Two servings per week of salmon, mackerel, sardines, or herring provides roughly 250–500 mg/day of combined EPA+DHA when averaged across the week, which meets the minimum recommendation for most adults. If you eat fish less frequently, do not eat fish at all, or have specific goals requiring higher doses (cognitive decline prevention, mood support), supplementation fills the gap reliably and affordably.
How do I know if my fish oil has gone rancid?
The smell test is the most accessible check. Open the bottle or bite into a capsule. Fresh fish oil smells mildly oceanic or nearly neutral. Rancid fish oil has a sharp, pungent, paint-like odor that is distinctly unpleasant. If your supplement causes persistent fishy burps with an acrid taste, rancidity is a likely cause. Ideally, choose products from brands that publish TOTOX values on their certificates of analysis, and check these numbers against the GOED limit of 26.
Should I take fish oil in the morning or evening?
Timing does not meaningfully affect the efficacy of omega-3 supplementation. The most important consideration is taking it with a meal that contains fat, which enhances absorption. Choose whatever mealtime is most convenient and consistent for you. Consistency of daily intake matters far more than timing.
Is cod liver oil a good alternative to regular fish oil?
Cod liver oil provides EPA and DHA along with naturally occurring vitamins A and D. This can be an advantage if you are deficient in those vitamins, but it also introduces a ceiling on dosing — because vitamins A and D can accumulate to toxic levels, you cannot take large amounts of cod liver oil to reach high EPA+DHA doses without risking hypervitaminosis. For most people seeking therapeutic omega-3 doses, a standard concentrated fish oil supplement (without added fat-soluble vitamins) provides more dosing flexibility.
Do enteric-coated capsules make a difference?
Enteric coatings prevent the capsule from dissolving in the stomach, instead releasing the oil in the small intestine. This can reduce fishy burps and reflux, which are the most common complaints with fish oil supplements. Enteric coating does not meaningfully affect overall absorption — EPA and DHA are absorbed in the small intestine regardless. If you experience gastrointestinal discomfort or fishy aftertaste, enteric-coated capsules are a practical solution, but they are not necessary for efficacy.
Sources
Albert, B. B., Cameron-Smith, D., Hofman, P. L., & Cutfield, W. S. (2015). Oxidation of marine omega-3 supplements and human health. BioMed Research International, 2015, 143109.
Jackowski, S. A., Alvi, A. Z., Engelen, A., Perreault, M., & Bhullar, A. S. (2015). Oxidation levels of North American over-the-counter n-3 (omega-3) supplements and the influence of supplement formulation and delivery form on evaluating oxidative safety. Journal of Nutritional Science, 4, e30.
Bannenberg, G., Mallon, C., Edwards, H., Yeadon, D., Yan, K., Johnson, H., & Ismail, A. (2017). Omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid content and oxidation state of fish oil supplements in New Zealand. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1488.
Garcia-Hernandez, V. M., Gallar, M., Sanchez-Soriano, J., Micol, V., Roche, E., & Garcia-Garcia, E. (2016). Effect of omega-3 dietary supplements with different oxidation levels in the lipidic profile of women. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, 29, 101–107.
Dyerberg, J., Madsen, P., Moller, J. M., Aardestrup, I., & Schmidt, E. B. (2010). Bioavailability of marine n-3 fatty acid formulations. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids, 83(3), 137–141.
Lawson, L. D., & Hughes, B. G. (1988). Absorption of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid from fish oil triacylglycerols or fish oil ethyl esters co-ingested with a high-fat meal. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 156(2), 960–963.
Ramprasath, V. R., Eyal, I., Zchut, S., & Jones, P. J. (2013). Enhanced increase of omega-3 index in healthy individuals with response to 4-week n-3 fatty acid supplementation from krill oil versus fish oil. Lipids in Health and Disease, 12, 178.
Yurko-Mauro, K., McCarthy, D., Rom, D., Nelson, E. B., Ryan, A. S., Blackwell, A., … & Stedman, M. (2010). Beneficial effects of docosahexaenoic acid on cognition in age-related cognitive decline. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 6(6), 456–464.
Sublette, M. E., Ellis, S. P., Geant, A. L., & Mann, J. J. (2011). Meta-analysis of the effects of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) in clinical trials in depression. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 72(12), 1577–1584.
Liao, Y., Xie, B., Zhang, H., He, Q., Guo, L., Subramaniapillai, M., … & McIntyre, R. S. (2019). Efficacy of omega-3 PUFAs in depression: A meta-analysis. Translational Psychiatry, 9(1), 190.
Ryan, L., & Nelson, E. B. (2008). Assessing the effect of docosahexaenoic acid on cognitive function in healthy, preschool children: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Lipids, 43, 1–11.
Schuchardt, J. P., & Hahn, A. (2013). Bioavailability of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids, 89(1), 1–8.